Four assumptions that influence the 2023 Elections

Right now, Nigerians are bashing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) after the postponement of the elections threw many weddings in flux, already overdue aircraft flights in disarray, and affected an education already mired in disaster. And, especially, Nigerians must address one greater week wherein governance takes a returned seat. The usa has already continued an extended pause, and it is best going to emerge as greater costly and unhelpful.

Indeed, there is little justification in a choice to delay at the eleventh hour, but it might be worth sparing a notion for INEC, an employer designed to fail.

It is genuine that INEC actually has one task—which they didn’t do on time—but numerous institutional functions mean that we do no longer have a certainly impartial electoral frame. This goes past the recent postponement and speaks to the basis of the corporation’s functionality and feasibility, and until those troubles are addressed, Nigeria will keep getting the elections it deserves.

In a bit on electoral management in Nigeria, J Shola Omotola touches on 3 key troubles that affect the perceived independence of our electoral management frame. For starters, the Constitution gives the right to rent a Chair to the President after session with the Council of State. Although the approval of the Council of State gives some checks and balances, the sensitive nature of the appointment in a nascent democracy like Nigeria’s leaves room for impropriety. In Ghana, those positions are appointed to a term corresponding to their Appeal Court Justices (which offers a obligatory retirement age), reducing the motivation to endear oneself to the appointer (the president).

Read More
More From This is Nigeria

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *